Chile: UN Child Rights Committee decides first-ever international child abduction case - OHCHR
The UN Human Rights Office and the mechanisms we support work on a wide range of human rights topics. Learn more about each topic, see who's involved, and find the latest news, reports, events and more.
OHCHR: Main Navigation/All Languages
OHCHR: Main Navigation/All Languages
Learn about how you can report a human rights violation.
OHCHR: Main Navigation/All Languages
Get the latest from our news, events and meetings.
OHCHR: Main Navigation/All Languages
UN Human Rights welcomes your queries.
Get Involved
Press releases Treaty bodies
16 June 2022
Press releases
Press releases
Press releases
GENEVA (16 June 2022) – Chile violated the rights of a six-year-old boy with autism when its Supreme Court decided to return him to Spain without assessing his best interests, the UN Child Rights Committee has found.
The Committee issued its landmark decision today after considering a complaint filed by a Chilean mother who had travelled from Spain to Chile with her child and alleged that the child was particularly vulnerable because he was under treatment for his autism with her support. She alleged that the Supreme Court’s decision to return him to Spain would cause severe and irreparable harm to his mental health.
The 6-year-old J.M. was born in Chile to a Chilean mother and a Spanish father in January 2016. When J.M. was 15 months old and living in Spain, his paediatrician suspected that he had a language delay and a form of autism. In July 2017, the father signed an authorization for the mother to travel with J.M. to Chile, where the mother arranged treatment and support for J.M.’s autism and they decided to stay in the country for at least two years.
In July 2018, however, the father filed a complaint with the Ministry of Justice of Spain against the mother for the abduction and unlawful retention of J.M., under the procedure established by the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Convention establishes that, as a general principle, a child who has been wrongfully removed or retained shall be promptly returned to the country of his or her habitual residence.
Two lower courts of Chile in early 2019 rejected the father’s claims, citing that he had given his tacit and almost explicit consent for J. M. to reside in Chile and that it had not been proven that Spain was J.M.’s country of habitual residence. Later that year, the Supreme Court overturned the lower courts’ decisions and ordered J. M.’s return to Spain.
J. M.’s mother thereafter filed a complaint on his behalf before the Committee in 2020.
The Committee held that the Supreme Court’s order for the immediate restitution of J.M. to Spain failed to conduct a best interests assessment required in all actions concerning children and thus violated his procedural guarantees under the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The Committee noted that, under the Hague Convention, decisions on the return of children must be taken especially promptly to ensure that the child’s normal situation is duly restored. However, the Committee considered that the purpose and objective of the Hague Convention does not entail that a return of the child should be automatically ordered, “Courts still have to effectively assess the applicability of the exceptions to the rule of return in the specific case, namely, whether the return would expose him/her to physical or psychological harm, taking the child’s best interests as a primary consideration,” said Committee member Ann Skelton.
“This is an important decision by the Committee that will hopefully guide domestic courts on how to decide cases of international abduction of children in accordance with their obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child,” said Skelton.
“The Committee did not find that the child should necessarily remain in Chile. Instead, it found that the Supreme Court failed to apply the necessary procedural safeguards to ensure that the return would not expose the child to harm or any situation contrary to his best interests,” she added.
The Committee considered that Chile should reassess the request for J. M.’s return to Spain, taking into account the time that had elapsed and the extent of his integration in Chile. It also held that Chile should grant J.M. effective reparation and prevent the recurrence of such violations in the future.
ENDS
For more information and media requests in Geneva, please contact:
Vivian Kwok at +41 (0) 22 917 9362 / vivian.kwok@un.org or UN Human Rights Office Media Section at +41 (0) 22 928 9855 / ohchr-media@un.org
Background:
The Committee on the Rights of the Child monitors States parties' adherence to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and its Optional Protocols on involvement of children in armed conflict, and on sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. The Convention to date has 196 States parties. The Committee is made up of 18 members who are independent human rights experts drawn from around the world, who serve in their personal capacity and not as representatives of States parties. The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure (OPIC-CRC) allows the Committee to receive and examine complaints by individuals or groups of individuals claiming to be victims of a violation of the rights of the child by States that have ratified the Optional Protocol. To date, 48 States have ratified or acceded to the OPIC-CRC. The Committee’s views and decisions on individual communications are an independent assessment of States’ compliance with their human rights obligations under the Convention and its two substantive optional protocols.
Learn more with our videos on the Treaty Body system and the Child Rights Committee!
Follow the UN Treaty Bodies on social media!
We are on Twitter @UNTreatyBodies
VIEW THIS PAGE IN:
Our Work
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights is the leading United Nations entity in the field of human rights, with a unique mandate to promote and protect all human rights for all people.
Latest
Resources
Connect
Global Social Channels
source